A00 |
Misc. flank openings |
|
O'Shea – Quinn |
½-½ |
14 |
A04 |
Réti opening |
|
Orr – Heidenfeld |
1-0 |
57 |
A05 |
Réti opening |
|
Kane – Arakhamia-Grant |
0-1 |
36 |
A10 |
English |
|
Rochev – Cooper |
1-0 |
49 |
A15 |
English, 1...Nf6 (Anglo-Indian defense) |
|
Jeffares – Speelman |
0-1 |
21 |
|
Jeffares – Healy |
1-0 |
39 |
A20 |
English, 1....e5 |
|
Jeffares – Normoyle |
1-0 |
32 |
A25 |
English, closed system |
|
Orr – Van Dijk |
½-½ |
19 |
A28 |
English, four knights system |
|
Rochev – Murray |
1-0 |
17 |
A29 |
English, four knights system |
|
Grant – O'Driscoll |
1-0 |
27 |
|
Grant – Quinn |
1-0 |
31 |
A40 |
Queen's pawn |
|
Baburin – Williams |
1-0 |
40 |
|
Baburin – Speelman |
½-½ |
19 |
A46 |
Queen's pawn game |
|
Speelman – Mendelson |
1-0 |
35 |
A48 |
King's Indian defence |
|
Speelman – Lopez |
1-0 |
23 |
B00 |
King's pawn opening |
|
White – Harnett |
1-0 |
35 |
|
Van Dijk – Quinn |
½-½ |
54 |
B01 |
Scandinavian (centre counter) defence |
|
Arakhamia-Grant – McPhillips |
0-1 |
53 |
|
Collins – McPhillips |
1-0 |
19 |
|
Fox – O'Shea |
½-½ |
19 |
B03 |
Alekhine's defence |
|
Cooper – Baburin |
0-1 |
49 |
|
Hanley, C. – Baburin |
1-0 |
59 |
B06 |
Robatsch (modern) defence |
|
Hanley – Rochev |
½-½ |
43 |
B08 |
Pirc classical (two knights) system |
|
Lopez – Harnett |
½-½ |
18 |
B10 |
Caro-Kann defence |
|
Lopez – Connolly |
1-0 |
34 |
|
White – Grant |
1-0 |
45 |
B12 |
Caro-Kann defence |
|
Nunn – Van Dijk |
1-0 |
56 |
B13 |
Caro-Kann exchange variation |
|
Cooper – Mendelson |
½-½ |
15 |
B15 |
Caro-Kann, 3.Nc3 |
|
Jones – Mendelson |
1-0 |
32 |
B17 |
Caro-Kann, Steinitz variation |
|
Collins – Healy |
1-0 |
60 |
B23 |
Sicilian closed |
|
Fox – Jones |
0-1 |
36 |
|
Van Dijk – Galligan |
1-0 |
37 |
|
Keogh – Galligan |
1-0 |
37 |
|
Van Dijk – Lopez |
0-1 |
55 |
B24 |
Sicilian, closed |
|
Keogh – O'Shea |
1-0 |
34 |
B27 |
Sicilian, 2.Nf3 sundry |
|
O'Shea – Orr |
0-1 |
37 |
|
Hanley – Jones |
½-½ |
9 |
B31 |
Sicilian, Nimzovitch-Rossolimo attack |
|
Harnett – Van Voorthuijsen |
½-½ |
26 |
|
Murray – O'Leary |
½-½ |
25 |
B32 |
Sicilian, 2...Nc6 3.d4 |
|
Connolly – O'Leary |
½-½ |
33 |
B33 |
Sicilian, 2...Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 |
|
Collins – Cafolla |
1-0 |
43 |
|
Murray – Cafolla |
0-1 |
62 |
|
Normoyle – Cafolla |
0-1 |
37 |
B40 |
Sicilian, 2.Nf3 e6 |
|
Cooper – Jeffares |
1-0 |
55 |
|
Nunn – Rochev |
½-½ |
35 |
B42 |
Sicilian Kan, 5.Bd3 |
|
Connolly – Jeffares |
½-½ |
48 |
B50 |
Sicilian, 2.Nf3 d6 |
|
White – Hanley |
½-½ |
43 |
|
Lopez – Hanley |
½-½ |
38 |
B63 |
Sicilian Richter-Rauzer, Rauzer attack |
|
Arakhamia-Grant – Van Voorthuijsen |
½-½ |
39 |
B64 |
Sicilian Richter-Rauzer, Rauzer attack |
|
Jones – Van Voorthuijsen |
1-0 |
36 |
B70 |
Sicilian dragon |
|
Nunn – Jones |
1-0 |
30 |
B75 |
Sicilian dragon, Yugoslav attack |
|
Arakhamia-Grant – Hanley |
0-1 |
36 |
B90 |
Sicilian Najdorf |
|
Connolly – Galligan |
½-½ |
10 |
B92 |
Sicilian Najdorf, Opočenský variation |
|
Heidenfeld – Nunn |
0-1 |
54 |
B96 |
Sicilian Najdorf, 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 |
|
Hanley – Collins |
½-½ |
55 |
C00 |
French defence |
|
Jones – Williams |
0-1 |
38 |
C04 |
French Tarrasch, Guimard main line |
|
Normoyle – Short |
0-1 |
24 |
C07 |
French Tarrasch, 3...c5 |
|
Nunn – Speelman |
½-½ |
10 |
C19 |
French Winawer, main line |
|
Keogh – Williams |
0-1 |
44 |
C26 |
Vienna game |
|
Quinn – Cooper |
0-1 |
38 |
|
Quinn – Keogh |
½-½ |
43 |
C31 |
Falkbeer counter-gambit |
|
Harnett – Keogh |
1-0 |
38 |
C41 |
Philidor |
|
Murray – Keogh |
½-½ |
51 |
C48 |
Four knights |
|
Fox – Cooper |
½-½ |
23 |
C65 |
Ruy Lopez, Berlin defence |
|
Hanley, C. – White |
½-½ |
39 |
|
Heidenfeld – White |
1-0 |
30 |
C77 |
Ruy Lopez, Morphy defence |
|
Heidenfeld – Fox |
1-0 |
68 |
C78 |
Ruy Lopez, 5.O-O |
|
Normoyle – Murray |
½-½ |
59 |
D01 |
Richter-Veresov attack |
|
Quinn – Connolly |
1-0 |
36 |
D07 |
Chigorin defence |
|
Mendelson – McPhillips |
1-0 |
37 |
|
Galligan – Cafolla |
1-0 |
26 |
D11 |
Slav, 3.Nf3 |
|
Mendelson – Van Dijk |
½-½ |
36 |
|
Orr – Collins |
0-1 |
67 |
D14 |
Slav, exchange variation |
|
Cafolla – O'Driscoll |
½-½ |
51 |
D15 |
Slav, 4.Nc3 |
|
Van Voorthuijsen – Heidenfeld |
½-½ |
42 |
|
Williams – Collins |
1-0 |
47 |
D19 |
Slav, Dutch variation |
|
O'Driscoll – Connolly |
1-0 |
43 |
D38 |
Queen's gambit declined, Ragozin variation |
|
Williams – Orr |
1-0 |
35 |
|
Williams – Hanley, C. |
½-½ |
22 |
D48 |
QGD semi-Slav, Meran, 8...a6 |
|
Healy – O'Driscoll |
½-½ |
10 |
D51 |
Queen's gambit declined, 4.Bg5 Nbd7 |
|
Short – Hanley, C. |
0-1 |
33 |
D55 |
Queen's gambit declined, 6.Nf3 |
|
Kane – Fox |
0-1 |
42 |
D56 |
Queen's gambit declined, Lasker defence |
|
McPhillips – White |
1-0 |
32 |
D58 |
QGD Tartakover (Makagonov-Bondarevsky) |
|
Grant – Fox |
1-0 |
47 |
D74 |
Neo-Grünfeld, 6.cxd5 Nxd5, 7.O-O |
|
Baburin – O'Shea |
1-0 |
39 |
D85 |
Grünfeld exchange variation |
|
McPhillips – Murray |
1-0 |
47 |
|
McPhillips – Lopez |
½-½ |
33 |
D93 |
Grünfeld with Bf4, ...O-O, e3 |
|
O'Leary – O'Shea |
0-1 |
28 |
E00 |
Queen's pawn game |
|
O'Leary – Normoyle |
½-½ |
19 |
|
Van Voorthuijsen – Kane |
1-0 |
47 |
|
Van Voorthuijsen – Grant |
1-0 |
36 |
E11 |
Bogo-Indian defence |
|
O'Driscoll – Kane |
0-1 |
27 |
|
O'Leary – Kane |
0-1 |
19 |
E24 |
Nimzo-Indian, Sämisch variation |
|
Galligan – Normoyle |
0-1 |
37 |
E27 |
Nimzo-Indian, Sämisch variation |
|
Galligan – Heidenfeld |
0-1 |
41 |
E30 |
Nimzo-Indian, Leningrad variation |
|
Short – Jeffares |
0-1 |
41 |
E39 |
Nimzo-Indian, classical, Pirc variation |
|
Rochev – Grant |
1-0 |
39 |
E44 |
Nimzo-Indian, Fischer variation, 5.Ne2 |
|
Mendelson – Rochev |
1-0 |
45 |
E60 |
King's Indian defence |
|
Baburin – Nunn |
1-0 |
30 |
|
Speelman – Hanley, C. |
½-½ |
25 |
E72 |
King's Indian with e4 and g3 |
|
Short – Arakhamia-Grant |
0-1 |
41 |
E91 |
King's Indian, 6.Be2 |
|
Cafolla – Arakhamia-Grant |
0-1 |
22 |
|
Healy – O'Leary |
1-0 |
34 |
E92 |
King's Indian, classical variation |
|
Orr – Harnett |
1-0 |
46 |
|
Healy – Short |
0-1 |
30 |
E94 |
King's Indian, orthodox variation |
|
O'Driscoll – Hanley, C. |
0-1 |
37 |
|