Irish Championship 2020

The Irish Championship 2020 begins today, thanks to heroic efforts by the ICU and by local organisers at Coláiste Éanna. Best of luck to all involved!

A report has been added to the Irish championships page here, and will be updated as the event proceeds.

Update, August 1: round 1 produced several surprises. Stephen Brady was annihilated by Eoghan Casey, and Killian Delaney lost to Alex Byrne, while three of the lower boards ended in draws. Due to a problem with live boards, 7 of the game scores are incomplete for the moment.

Update, August 2: the live board feed of Daly – Venkatesan, round 1, broke off at a very interesting point. The full score has now been added; many thanks to Colm for providing it.

Update, August 2: round 2 produced another upset, with David Fitzsimons coming unstuck against Shane Melaugh, while Stephen Brady dropped another ½ point against Peter Cafolla. All games from the first two rounds, including the ones previously incomplete, are now available.

Update, August 3: round 3 saw Sam Collins outplay Conor O’Donnell in an ending to take a clear lead with 3/3, followed by Colm Daly and Tom O’Gorman (who drew today) and the Kanyamaralas (who drew with each other yesterday) on 2½. The games seemed generally much more combative today for some reason; the most spectacular was Paul Wallace’s win against Gavin Melaugh.

Update, August 5: round 4 saw draws on the top two boards, involving Sam Collins, Colm Daly, Tom O’Gorman, and Tarun Kanyamarala, with most other competitors gaining ground. Collins was ½ point ahead of five players. Round 5 upended the tight bunching, with Collins impressively winning as Black against Tarun K., and Daly winning as Black against David Fitzsimons, after a strange blunder by the latter in an equal position. For some reason, there seemed to be quite a few blunders in this round: perhaps the longer time control is causing fatigue? After round 5, Collins is ½ point ahead of Daly, and a full point ahead of a chasing pack of five players.

Update, August 6: a dramatic round 6 saw Sam Collins stumble, blundering in an equal position against Tom O’Gorman. Even then he had a late chance to rescue a half point from a completely lost ending, but missed it. Colm Daly took advantage of a blunder from another equal position to win, and move into sole lead. The game of the round, and indeed the event so far, was Killian Delaney’s hard-fought win against Conor O’Donnell. With three rounds to go, Daly leads by ½ point over Collins, O’Gorman, and Delaney.

Update, August 7: if the previous round was dramatic, round 7 was sensational. On the top board, Colm Daly emerged from the opening against Killian Delaney with a hopelessly lost position, while elsewhere the main challengers stood no better in their games. Just as a resignation seemed to be looming, though, Delaney blundered and Daly smartly capitalised. Sam Collins also won, very neatly. After round 7, Daly leads by ½ point over Collins, and a full point over Tom O’Gorman, and all possible meetings between these players have already happened. Round 8 should see Conor O’Donnell with white against Daly, and Collins with white against David Fitzsimons. All is delayed, though, because of the government’s newly announced lockdown of Laois, Offaly, and Kildare, and the draw will not be finalised until a few hours before the round.

Update, August 8: Newly imposed COVID-19 restrictions meant that three players had to sit out round 8, including Killian Delaney, who still had an outside chance of winning the event. The clash between Stephen Brady and Colm Daly on top board looked troublesome for the latter at one stage, but quickly petered out into a level position and in due course a draw. Sam Collins defeated David Fitzsimons in impressive style, while Tom O’Gorman won against Paul Wallace. Going into the last round, Collins and Daly are tied for the lead on 6½, followed by O’Gorman on 6 and Conor O’Donnell on 5½. The tie-break rules mean that any of Collins, Daly, or O’Gorman can win the title.

Update, August 9: An early win by Tom O’Gorman on board 3 left him on 7 points. Sam Collins seemed to get into difficulties out of the opening against Stephen Brady, and the game steadily went downhill for him. On board 1, Colm Daly stood marginally worse out of the opening against Conor O’Donnell, and needed to draw to take the championship to a rapid playoff, but he too did not manage to solve his problems, and he lost in one of the last games to finish. This left Tom O’Gorman as sole winner of the event, for his first Irish championship.

Overall, an excellent and entertaining event, with much fighting chess—very few draws—and plenty of drama.

Posted in Irish championships, Tournaments | 1 Comment

Irish championship players, updated

The lists of Irish championship players have been updated to include the 2019 championship: see the full list in descending order of number of championships played, and the same in alphabetical order.

All players from the first Irish championship in 1865 have been added; previously only 3 were included. In addition, 5 more players from the 1889 championship have been added: these were the players who did not receive odds (and were thus eligible for the title of Irish champion) but did not qualify for the final.

Two errors have been corrected: ‘J. Cummings’ (1975) was Jim Cummins, and ‘J. G. McDonnell’ (1978) was Gerard McDonnell.

In addition, the mysterious player ‘S. O’Nuadhain’ (1983) has been confirmed as Joe Noone. I had strongly suspected this, and finally found confirmation earlier this month in Alan Ludgate’s scoresheets. Coincidentally, Gerry MacElligott sent a message a few days later saying the same thing, with background.

Full player names have been added for Roger Beckett, Eugene Bergin, John Butler, Peter Carroll, Malachy Doherty, Robert Dundas, David Flannery, Seán Galligan, Seán Gilroy, Peter J. Hayes, Denis Healy, Tom Healy, Liam Hearns, Mihailo Manojlovic, Alan McDonagh, Niall McDonnell, Conor E. Murphy, Zalan Nemeth, Michael O’Brien, Alice O’Gorman, A. R. (Alexander Ritchie) Orr, Stephen Rush, Brian Walls and Michael Welsh.

Corrections are welcome, as always.

Posted in Players | Leave a comment

Johannesburg 1955

In my earlier article Heidenfeld and the 1958 Irish Championship I touched upon the circumstances in which Wolfgang Heidenfeld, German born but resident in South Africa for over 20 years, came to Ireland. In Mark Orr’s broader biographical sketch Wolfgang Heidenfeld 1911-1981, in the section Chess Career, there is this snippet of information:

In 1955 he clinched first place in the last round (#1) of a South African tournament by beating former world champion Max Euwe.

That tournament was the Johannesburg International and Heidenfeld also co-authored the Tournament Book with Kurt Dreyer. (#2)

Johannesburg 1955 Tournament Book Cover

Tournament book front cover

Heidenfeld got off to a poor start in the tournament, being on the wrong side of a brilliant miniature in Round 1. The division of responsibility between the co-authors had Heidenfeld providing the round-by-round summaries for the tournament book. So here is his own take on that disastrous beginning.

None of this wood-shifting and trench warfare for Heidenfeld and Wolpert! Out into the open field battle marched their armies, with the knights jousting and the bishops and pawns doing their best to follow suit, though historically speaking, they have no business to joust. First Heidenfeld sent a bishop to his early death, for which he exacted the tribute of one of his opponent’s castles. Wolpert seemed to like the idea of levying tributes for the deaths of one’s men and began to offer his in droves, but Heidenfeld, not wanting to be involved in heavy reparations, declined offer after offer. Finally, however, a whisper ran through the ringside audience: “Heidenfeld will be mate in three.” The only one unconcerned was Heidenfeld himself – which was not due to his sangfroid in dangerous positions, but to the simple fact that he had not seen it. For this sporting return to the middle ages Wolpert later received the brilliancy prize.

Position after 10…Qxg2

Wolfgang Heidenfeld — Jack Wolpert
Johannesburg, 1955, Round 1
[Play through the game at ICU website]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 Nf6 4. Nc3 Nbd7 5. Bc4 Be7 6. Bxf7+ Kxf7 7. Ng5+ Kg8 8. Ne6 Qe8 9. Nxc7 Qg6 10. Nxa8 Qxg2 [Diagram] 11. Rf1 exd4 12. Qxd4 Ne5 13. f4 Nfg4 14. Qd5+ Nf7 15. Qc4 Bh4+ 16. Kd1 Be6 17. Qe2 Nf2+ 18. Rxf2 Bxf2 19. f5 Qg1+ 20. Kd2 Ne5 [We have reached the position featured on the front cover of the Tournament Book ] 21. Nd1 Be1+ 22. Qxe1 Qd4+ and White resigned 0-1

After five rounds Euwe had collected 4.5 points, ahead of fellow-Dutchman, International  Master Willem Jan Muehring (#3) on 4.0 and Heidenfeld on 3.5. The latter two had drawn their individual game – here again is Heidenfeld in his best lyrical prose.

With the two Dutch masters in the lead so early in the tournament, the gradually increasing audiences not unreasonably expected superhuman efforts from the South African players in order to catch up with the invaders. The third round was scheduled to be the medium of one of the key games in this effort – and many spectators lounged voluptuously in their comfortable chairs, their eyes glued to the wall-boards, so as to enjoy the tremendous battle that was sure to develop between Muehring and their very own champion, W. Heidenfeld. A grim queen’s pawn was pushed on both sides, gradually warriors of higher rank entered the battle field, amid steadily mounting tension; the white pieces were at their counterparts throats, and vice versa and then at move 11, the climax was reached. Heidenfeld was observed leaning over to his opponent and those near enough distinctly heard him say in German, “Do we have to continue this boring nonsense?” Muehring vehemently agreed that they did not – whereupon both contestants took the rest of the evening off. And thus August 16th will forever be remembered as the date of one of the epic battles of history.

Returning to the situation after Round 5, the tournament appeared set up for a grandstand finish as Max Euwe still had to play his two closest pursuers in the final two rounds. First up for the former world champion was Heidenfeld, to whom we once again turn for an overview of the game.

It all started innocently enough. A slow Giuoco Piano, such as Dr. Euwe must have played scores of times in his tournament practice resulted in a lot of behind-the-scenes manoeuvring on both sides, with knights carrying important messages from one wing to the other and bishops tucked away inconspicuously in the corners. It was one such bishop that caused all the subsequent trouble when, as a result of a superficial move by the grandmaster, he became pinned against a castle, like a moth in an entomologist’s collection. Gradually the whole of the black forces had to be inconvenienced for the sake of this bishop, a stream of pilgrims from all over the world huddled around him, offering their insubstantial prayers, but all to no avail – on the 36th move his fate was sealed, and with it that of the game.

Position after 21.Rea2

Wolfgang Heidenfeld — Max Euwe
Johannesburg 1955, Round 6
[Play through the game at ICU website]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Bb6 5. d4 Qe7 6. O-O d6 7. h3 Nf6 8. Re1 O-O 9. a4 a6 10. Na3 Kh8 11. Nc2 Ng8 12. b4 f6 13. Ne3 Ba7 14. Ba3 Qe8 15. Qd3 Nce7 16. b5 axb5 17. axb5 Qh5 18. Nf1 Qe8 19. Re2 Ng6 20. Bc1 Bd7 21. Rea2 [Diagram] Qb8 22. b6 cxb6 23. Bb5 Bxb5 24. Qxb5 N8e7 25. Ne3 Nc8 26. Nd5 Nge7 27. Nxe7 Nxe7 28. dxe5 Nc6 29. exd6 Na5 30. Ba3 Rd8 31. e5 Qc8 32. Bb4 Nc6 33. Qd5 fxe5 34. Nxe5 Nxe5 35. Qxe5 Qb8 36. Qe7 b5 and Black resigned 1-0

Going into the final round it is now Muehring who is in the lead on 5 points with Euwe and Heidenfeld both a half-point behind. After commenting on the Euwe-Muehring encounter which ends in a draw (but not before the less famous Dutchman has missed a study-like win), Heidenfeld’s round report moves on to his own game. The military references this time include a name-check of a legendary 14th century Swiss soldier.

Meanwhile Wilken has played the type of game that Heidenfeld likes best to play against. After a timid opening the East Londoner loses more and more ground on the King-side, where the black infantry soon goose-steps across the equator. Behind it are assembled two rooks, two bishops, two Knights and the King, whilst the chatelaine stays behind to look after the affairs of the Queen-side where all is quiet. So much accumulated force is compressed within a narrow strip of the board that the white army is helpless against the assault when a black Winkelried on KB5 opens a breach; and suddenly the black Queen has joined her army by a flanking movement and it is she who administers the coup de grace. Thus Heidenfeld, scoring 5.5 out of 6 after his initial defeat, has caught Muehring on the finishing line.

Position after 34.hxg3

Leon Wilken – Wolfgang Heidenfeld
Johannesburg 1955, Round 7
[Play through the game on ICU website]

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.g3 g6 3.Bg2 Bg7 4.0-0 0-0 5.d3 d5 6.Nbd2 Nbd7 7.e4 e5 8.exd5 Nxd5 9.a4 c6 10.a5 f5 11.Nc4 Qc7 12.Ng5 Nc5 13.Bd2 Ne6 14.Nf3 Nd8 15.Re1 Nf7 16.c3 Bd7 17.Qc2 Rae8 18.Bh3 h6 19.Nh4 Kh7 20.Rf1 Bf6 21.Nf3 g5 22.Bg2 Kg7 23.Kh1 Ne7 24.Ng1 Ng6 25.b4 h5 26.Be3 Qb8 27.Rae1 h4 28.Ne2 Rh8 29.Kg1 g4 30.Qd2 Be6 31.Nb2 Rh7 32.c4 Reh8 33.f3 hxg3 34.hxg3 [Diagram] f4 35.gxf4 Nh4 36.fxe5 Bxe5 37.Bf4 Nxg2 38.Bxe5+ Qxe5 39.f4 Qe3+ 40.Qxe3 Nxe3 and White resigned 0-1

Group photograph and crosstable

Tournament book page 2

(#1) As this article shows, the victory over Euwe was in the penultimate round.
(#2) All Heidenfeld’s games from the tournament can be found in the ICU database. All 28 games from the tournament are available in large databases, e.g. at 365Chess.
(#3) In the tournament Book (other than in the two references on page 2, where Meuhring is incorrectly given) this is the spelling of his name used. I have encountered Muhring in internet searches. In An Illustrated Dictionary of Chess by Edward R. Brace [Hamlyn, 1977] at page 193 the spelling Mühring is given in the entry on the Dutch IM and it may well be that this is the most precise rendering of his name. Muehring is probably an acceptable alternative, as in World Championship Candidate Robert Hübner/Huebner.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A game in a thousand

The Irish Championship 1991 featured a spectacular game between the brothers Niall and Gerard McDonnell. Where the average interesting game might have one or two critical points of interest, this game had a dozen at the very least. It featured an unusual material balance, an exposed king taking a long tour, major ebbs and flows of fortune, and even left a note of mystery in its final result.

The tournament report has limited notes; for those in search of puzzles, an unannotated version is also available here, and also on the ICU website. Some interesting moments are at move 37 with Black to play (‘37B’), 38B, 41W, 42B, 45W, 48W, 48B, 55W, 57B, and 58W. Here are some excerpts, chosen almost at random.

At move 30, Black had an overwhelmingly won game, and could now finish White off quickly:

Niall McDonnell - Gerard McDonnell, Irish championship 1991, 30W

30… ?

Fifteen moves later, after further missed opportunities, it was all much more complicated:

Niall McDonnell - Gerard McDonnell, Irish championship 1991, 45W

45… ?

Twelve moves after that, and in a very difficult ending, Black’s situation was critical:

Niall McDonnell - Gerard McDonnell, Irish championship 1991, 57W

57… ?

The final position is picturesque, but the verdict is obvious: White has a perpetual check starting with 70. Qg3+. But the result is 0-1. Why?

Niall McDonnell - Gerard McDonnell, Irish championship 1991, final position

70. ?

[Click to replay the full game (warning: spoilers).]

Posted in Games, Irish championships, Tournaments | Leave a comment

Irish Championship 1991

A report on the Irish Championship 1991 has been added to the tournament section here.

Stephen Brady became champion for the first of many times, a point clear of Colm Daly, Mark Heidenfeld (who was playing in his first Irish championship), Gerard McDonnell, and Gerard O’Connell. Brady beat Daly, McDonnell, the defending champion John Delaney, and Philip Short, for a convincing victory.

Castlebar’s Gerard McDonnell was unfortunate to lose from a much better position against Philip Short in round 1.

G. McDonnell - Short, Irish Championship 1991

G. McDonnell – Short, Irish Championship 1991
42. ?

White would stand much better after 42. Rf8, but instead McDonnell played 42. Rg8+? Kf5
43. Rxh7??
, and after 43… Kxe5 found himself in a mating net. After 44. Kc6, Black could have won immediately with 44… Rc2+ 45. Kd7 Rb7+, winning a rook and mating in a few moves, but instead erred in turn (time may have been a factor on both sides) with 44… Rc3+??, when White could have struggled on with 45. Kb7 Rb2+ 46. Ka8 Ra3+ 47. Ra7 Rxa7+ 48. Kxa7, though Black is winning even then. After Black’s 44th, White either resigned or lost on time.

After 42. Rg8+? Kf5, White had to play 43. Rf8+ Kxe5 44. Rxd5+! exd5 45. Re8+ Kf5 46. Rxe2, with an equal ending.

[Click to replay the full game.]

Posted in Irish championships, Tournaments | Leave a comment

Horace Curzon Plunkett and the Oxford-Cambridge matches

Horace Curzon Plunkett played for Oxford University in four Oxford v. Cambridge ‘Varsity’ matches, in the years 1874 to 1877. The very first such match had been held in 1873, at the invitation and venue of the City of London C.C., and generated enormous interest. An excellent illustration, from the Illustrated London News, is given on John Saunders’ Varsity Chess Matches 1873-present: Oxford University versus Cambridge University page at BritBase.

For the following year, Plunkett’s début, the match was again held at the City of London C.C., but this time “a substantial railing around the players enabled them to conduct their games with much greater comfort than last year when the crowd was very oppressive” (Huddersfield College Magazine, vol. 2, 1874, pp. 154-57). The same source commented that

“The merest glance at the games already played in the University Matches will show their great want of skill. Yet was this contest on both occasions watched with a keen and surprising interest by all the chess talent of London.”

Indeed, the event seems to have captured the imagination of the chessplaying public to an astonishing extent. The 1874 match attracted a crowd of 600-800, including Staunton, Löwenthal, Horwitz, Bird, Blackburne, Zukertort, and Steinitz, who acted as referee and adjudicator.

Plunkett played on board 5 against T. H. D. May, and recorded one draw and two losses. The draw, from the first round, survives. May blundered a pawn in the opening, and after several exchanges, which White did not resist, the diagrammed position was reached.

May - Plunkett, Varsity Match 1874

May – Plunkett, Varsity Match 1874
25… ?

Plunkett now erred via 25… Nxd4? (25… Kh7 must give excellent winning chances), and after 26. Rxd4 Rc2?! 27. Rxd5 Rxb2 28. Rd7, his advantage had entirely dissipated.

[Click to replay May – Plunkett.]

In 1877, Plunkett had advanced to captain and board 1 of the Oxford team, which he led to a convincing victory, scoring one win and one draw against John Neville Keynes (1856-1949), father of the economist John Maynard Keynes. Again the drawn game survives.

[Click to replay Keynes – Plunkett.]

Posted in Games, Players | Leave a comment

Horace Plunkett and the Parliamentary Cable Match, 1897

In 1897, the British House of Commons played a challenge match by cable against the U.S. House of Representatives. The top two boards on the House of Commons side were filled by players from Irish constituencies: the then Hon. Horace Curzon Plunkett (the ‘Sir’ was added in 1903) (County Dublin South), and John Howard Parnell, brother of Charles Stuart Parnell (Meath South).

Extended information about this match can be found in Edward Winter’s article Chess in the House of Commons at Chess Notes (2003, with subsequent additions). There’s an excellent picture of the ten players in the event (third picture of the article), with Plunkett at top left and Parnell at top right.

Plunkett’s opponent was Richmond Mumford Pearson, Jr., of North Carolina (bottom row, fourth from left). Unfortunately the latter didn’t put up much of a fight, and the game itself is of only historical interest. The overall standard seems to have been higher: the Westminster Budget, June 11, 1897 p. 26, wrote “Having watched the play during the progress of the match, we must admit that the games proved—except the American part of board No. 1—what we expected. … Four of the games have been good specimens of average chess”.

[Click to replay the full game.]

(The report in the Belfast News-Letter on June 1 menioned a ‘draw for play’. Could this mean that players were paired randomly, i.e., that board 1 was not reserved for the top player on each side? Or was it merely a draw for colours?)

Parnell lost a long game on board 2, and the match ended 2½-2½.

Posted in Games, Players | Leave a comment

Sir Horace Plunkett, circa 1920

Sir Horace Plunkett, circa 1920
A group including Sir Horace Plunkett (front row centre), Trinity College Dublin, circa 1920.
Image © UCD National University of Ireland, Dublin licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Last year, I posted on Sir Horace Plunkett, longtime President of Dublin C.C., MP, Senator, and a pioneer of the cooperative movement in Ireland, and on his role in hosting Capablanca when he visited Dublin in 1919 (drawing his individual game in the second simul).

The photo above is from an article Under attack: how the burning of co-operative creameries devastated rural Ireland, by Patrick Doyle, University of Manchester, published on the RTÉ website on May 18: an excellent article in a fascinating series that RTÉ has been running on the War of Independence and surrounding events.

Many thanks to Gerry MacElligott for the pointer.

Posted in Photos, Players | Leave a comment

Li – Williams, 4NCL Online 2020

The 4NCL Online event launched last month, and the first round Henry Li, playing board 1 for the Gonzaga B team (“Gonzaga B Sharps”), had White against Simon Williams.

The game reached a rook ending in which Black was two pawns to the good, but Williams misplayed it, simplifying to a R + 2P versus R ending, but one of the exceptional ones that is drawn.

The critical moment came a few moves later:

Li - Williams, 4NCl Online 2020

Li – Williams, 4NCL Online 2020
60. ?

After the game’s 60. Rd2?, White was lost, and Williams duly converted.

White has exactly one move that draws: 60. Ra4!. The point is that 60… b5 61. Ra6! cuts the black king off, and the black rook can’t both keep the white king cut off and support the pawn. Similarly, 60… Kc6 61. Kd4! Kb5 62. Ra2! prevents Black from making any further progress.

These days, it is easiest to explore the possibilities via the online Nalimov endgame tablebases. In former times, standard manuals would have to be consulted. The situation after 60. Ra4 b5 61. Ra6 is explored in Reuben Fine’s Basic Chess Endings (David McKay, 1941), pp. 294-6. In such cases, the defending king must be cut off four files from a knight’s pawn for the position to be a win. The critical position (W: Kb2, Re1, b4; B: Kf5, Rh3) was analysed by Grigorieff in 1937: White to play wins, Black to play draws.

[Click to replay the full game.]

Posted in Games | Leave a comment

Cork Congresses

A new sub-page on Cork Congresses has been added to the Tournament series page here.

This event, which started in 1993, was originally called the Cork City Congress, presumably to distinguish it from the Cork Chess Congress series that ran from 1983 to 1990. (There was also an earlier 1st Cork Weekend Congress in 1977.) [See update below.] Since about 2002, the new series has been generally known as the Cork Congress. (All rather confusing!)

The new page here provides links to all known games from the new series. These include 88 games (pgn) that are not in the ICU games archive, as of the date of this post, including 31 from the 2008 event and 41 from 2009 (downloaded some time ago from the Cork C.C. website, though apparently no longer available there). [See update below.]

Update, June 1, 2020: David McAlister has corrected the history of the previous Cork Congress, and has provided one extra game, from 1994, for which many thanks. The previous series started with the 1977 event, resumed in 1984 (so there was no 1983 event), and ended in 1991.

Posted in Cork Congresses, Tournaments | Leave a comment