Irish Junior (or Schools) Championships

The Irish Junior Championships are on this weekend in Blanchardstown. Best of luck to all participants!

Just in time for this event, David McAlister has put together a full list of all these events back to 1948, with just one exception (1996: can anyone please supply the missing information?).

Many familiar names are listed, including this year’s organiser John Delaney (joint champion in 1979), as well as yours truly (1979, 1981).

Some time back we had a great photo, supplied by Oliver Dunne, of the 1948 event, with the 1948 and 1949 winners Geoffrey Hand and Michael Fagan.

[Update, April 12, 2015: the photo may have been from the 1948 Leinster Schoolboys’ Championship.]

Posted in Tournaments | 2 Comments

Armstrong Cup 1901-02: Booterstown and Blackrock

The 1901-02 Armstrong Cup was contested by five teams: Booterstown and Blackrock, Dublin University, Rathmines, Dawson Street, and Calaroga. The competition was set up as a double-round league over eight boards, with match points counting.

BCM 1902 p180 Armstrong crosstable

We have the crosstable above plus the full list of fixtures, and scorecards for 11 of the 20 matches. The season has been added to the Armstrong Cup page and full season results have been tabulated on a separate page.

The Booterstown and Blackrock club was in the middle of the most successful run in its existence: this win formed the middle of a three-in-a-row, and they also won in 1898-99. Board 1 was A. A. [Albert Augustus] MacDonogh M.A. (ca. 1866-1934), founder and long-time headmaster of the Avoca School in Blackrock, now merged into Newpark Comprehensive. He was followed by T. G. [Thomas George] Cranston (1877/78-1954), later twice Irish champion (1922 and 1931) and R. T. [Ralph Theodore] Varian (ca. 1865-1951), later Leinster champion (1928). At board 5 was “F. S. B.”, or Mrs. F. Sterling Berry, one of the strongest women players of the era.

The Calaroga club played its home matches at 25 Rutland Square North. I wasn’t familiar with that, and on looking it up found that it is now Parnell Square. It’s therefore interesting to note that board 2 of the Dawson Street team during this season was John Howard Parnell (1843-1923), brother of Charles Stuart, and an M.P. in his own right (from 1895 to 1900).

I’m not sure if the Calaroga club ever competed before or since: they’re not listed in David McAlister’s Armstrong Cup page. But is the Nicholas McCluskey who played at boards 2 and 3 in this season—with a plus score in the records available— the same as the N. McCluskey who played in the winning Sackville team in 1925-26?

[Update, April 16, 2015: Many thanks to David McAlister for providing two further scorecards, of matches 11 and 17 (Dawson Street v. Booterstown and Calaroga v. Dublin University respectively); with these we can also infer the final score in match 20 (Dublin University v. Dawson Street). Both pages have now been updated with the new information.]

Posted in Armstrong Cup, Tournaments | Leave a comment

Bunratty Classic 2015

The Bunratty Congresses have been around for many years now but they still post-date my own playing career by several years, so I have never played in any of them. Looking at the various reports this is a matter of some regret for me, as it looks to be a fantastic tournament.

Strangely the Tournaments pages here have not included any of the entire series up to now, but now this omission is corrected with a report on this year’s Bunratty Classic, which produced two norms, one of which was the first ever GM norm at an event held in Ireland. Though there were some complaints in various quarters about the number of short draws, there were many interesting games as well.

Posted in Bunratty, Tournaments | Leave a comment

Trouble in the Tait

tnwr-23-1The latest issue of The New Winawer Report has (finally) been posted. This issue considers the Tait variation, which starts with the position at right, with Black to move.

The correspondence player (and now CC Senior International Master) Jonathan Tait discovered this around 1986 or 1987, and racked up a overwhelmingly positive score before publishing an article in Correspondence Chess in 1995. It’s rare that analysis from twenty years ago holds up so well: most of the essential points are present.

Later a major improvement was found for Black in Harding-Arounopoulos, World corr Ch 22, ½-final-05, 1997-99, and this classic game formed the foundation of the entire theory until as recently as 2010: see the discussion in Moskalenko’s The Wonderful Winawer (New in Chess 2010).

tnwr-23-2But theory turned again with a counter-improvement for White, after which the main line reaches the diagrammed position, with Black to play. The initial analysis given by Watson (ChessPublishing.com, May 2011) indicated that Black was lost. Strangely, though, several correspondence players have contested this verdict, and there are now nine practical examples in all. So far, though, Black has yet to record even a single draw.

Black needs new ideas. (For which see issue 24 …).

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

Healy-Scallan, Armstrong Cup 2014-15

Some interesting games from this year’s league campaign featured recently on the St. Benildus C.C. web pages. Among these was a rare bishop + knight versus king ending, from the game Healy—Scallan, St. Benildus v. Rathmines, Armstrong Cup.

Healy - Scallan, Armstrong Cup 2014-15The critical position is shown in the diagram, with Black to play his 66th. Fiachra Scallan played 66. … Kc5?, apparently under the impression that bishop and knight v. king was a draw. Though John Healy’s notes don’t mention it, with 66. … Kc7! Black draws. White can only extract the bishop by giving up the a-pawn, e.g., 67. Nd4 Rxa7 68. Bc6, but the resulting B + N + P v. R ending (once the h-pawn drops) is easily drawn. (Coincidentally, we recently had another example of a B + N + P v. R ending here). Otherwise Black follows up with 67. … Kb6 and 68. … Kxb5 69. Bb7 Rxa7 70. Nxa7+ Kb6.

In the present game Black made it easy for White by heading quickly for the ‘right’ corner (from the B + N point of view). Tim Harding gives the useful practical advice to defenders of this ending that they should head for the ‘wrong’-coloured corner on the opponent’s side of the board, on the basis that many players have practiced the winning manoeuvre with the defending king on the ‘top’ side of the board, and sometimes find it difficult to translate into the reversed setup.

Posted in Games | Leave a comment

Who did Dake play?

In the comments to “The trials of Aibhistín de Búrca” Paul Brown raises the issue of which player played A. Dake at Warsaw (de Burca or Cranston). At IRLchess we have plumped for de Búrca.

De Búrca, in his 1960 article “International Team Tournament Warsaw 1935”, tantalisingly refers to both Dake and the Ireland -v- U.S.A. match; however the two separate passages do not provide an answer.

The victorious U.S.A. team were very even in strength, and consisted of Fine, the brilliant veteran Marshall, Kupchik, Dake and Horowitz. Arthur Dake, playing on fourth board, mowed down the cannon-fodder opposed to him mercilessly and had the best personal score of the tournament (86%).
….
The Irish team was regarded as a push-over by the Americans, who made no secret of their opinion by arriving twenty minutes after the clocks had been started. On three boards, this opinion was speedily justified. This was one of the matches in which I was given my “opportunity”, and played like a terrified rabbit fascinated into immobility by a dangerous snake.

When contemporary sources differ, it can be very difficult to find a definitive solution. However, I believe I’ve found something that goes to the heart of the matter.

White's queen is attacked, yet he forces a quick mate. How?

White’s queen is attacked, yet he forces a quick mate. How?

In the very first issue of B.H. Wood’s “Chess” magazine, dated 14th September 1935, on page 12 the diagrammed position is given as Exercise No.2. On page 40 of the same issue the following solution is given:

“By Q x Pch, K x Q; P x P double check and mate. Dake v. Cranston at Warsaw.

So far this is just one more contemporary source but in the 14th November issue (at page 83) there was this correction:

“Exercise No.2 in our September number accused Mr Cranston of courting sudden death at the hands of Dake at Warsaw. Actually it was de Burca, reserve for Ireland, who suffered this fate. Our apologies, Mr. Cranston!

All the same, we feel justified in being a little aggrieved ourselves when no less an authority than the Warsaw daily bulletin errs.”

Unfortunately no source is given for the information, but we might guess it was Cranston himself. However it does provide both a 1935 solution as to which Irish player Dake played and an explanation as to how the confusion arose; probably as definitive as it gets. It might be more difficult to determine with certainty whether the game ended with the queen sacrifice or the checkmate.

Posted in Irish champions, Players | 2 Comments

Into the Labyrinth—II

The latest issue of The New Winawer Report has (finally!) been posted. It continues from the last issue’s discussion of the 13. Qxc3 line, where 16. … f6, long one of Black’s main defences, is in serious difficulties. The situation is no better for 16. … Be8, another main defence, so what’s left?

tnwr-22This issue considers the remaining possibility 16. … Na5 via the recently-completed correspondence game Churkina—Kirsanov, ICCF World Cup 20 prelim 1 2013. After 17 g4 (17 Rb4 is the alternative; it’s not covered in any detail in this issue but Black appears to be fine) 17. … Ba4! we reach the diagrammed position, which is critical for the soundness of the entire Poisoned Pawn, and which has received widely divergent evaluations.

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

Dunsany Premier Tourney 1941

The 1940 Irish Championship was affected by the late withdrawal of the two Ulster representatives, A.L.Davies and J.D. Peebles, because they were unable to travel to Dublin. As the Second World War continued into 1941, the Irish Chess Union Council decided, as the Ulster Chess Union was unable to be represented, to suspend the Irish championship for that year and replace it with a new competition, described as “the Dunsany Premier Tourney.”

The tournament was arranged to take place at the Dublin Chess Club from Monday 21st to Saturday 26th July and to be played on very similar lines to the Irish Championship with two four-hour sessions each day. Lord Dunsany, the President of the ICU, provided three valuable prizes.

There was a strong entry with the 1940 Champion, J.J. O’Hanlon, plus the four players who only finished a half-point behind him – C.J. Barry, Austin Bourke, Gerard Kerlin and Warwick Nash – all taking part. Two-time Irish champion, T.G. Cranston, who had not competed in 1940, was a strong addition.

The surprise of the first two days was O’Hanlon losing both his games on the Tuesday to Nash and Barry and it was Kerlin who was making the running, having won 4 games. On the Wednesday evening the second session was reserved for adjourned games to be played off and Kerlin was then held to a draw by O’Hanlon but still enjoyed a comfortable lead.

Standings after Round 5 and adjourned games played off:
G. Kerlin 4.5
T.G. Cranston 3.0 + 1 adj
W. Nash 3.0
J.J. O’Hanlon, L.J. Close 2.5
A. Bourke, R.T. Varian, C.J. Barry 2.0
T.A. Vard 1.5 + 1 adj
S.A. French 1.0

Day 4 on the Thursday and the tournament was thrown wide open again after Kerlin lost to both Cranston and Bourke respectively in Rounds 6 and 7. Despite this he was still a half-point ahead of Nash, Barry and Cranston, though the last-named had two adjourned games in hand.

Cranston fell out of contention for first by losing both his games on the Friday. Barry, his Round 9 conqueror, finished with 4 straight wins and posted a total of 6 points. Front-runner Kerlin had drawn in the Friday morning session; his Round 9 game against Close was adjourned and now he needed to win it to catch his Sackville CC club-mate Barry. With a number of adjournments scheduled for Saturday, the third prize (and second as well if Kerlin lost) was also still to be decided with four (of five) players in with a chance of winning it (them).

Standings after Round 9 with adjourned games still to be played off
C.J. Barry 6.0
G. Kerlin 5.0 + 1 adj
W. Nash 5.0
J.J. O’Hanlon, T.G. Cranston, A. Bourke 4.5 + 1 adj
L.J. Close 3.5 +1 adj
R.T. Varian 3.0 +1 adj
S.A. French 3.0
T.A. Vard 2.0 + 2 adj

In the Saturday morning adjournment session Kerlin beat Close to catch up with Barry. O’Hanlon, Cranston and Bourke all won their adjourned games to finish a half-point behind. As Bourke could not remain for a play-off for third prize, they drew lots which Bourke won. A play-off game played on the Saturday between Kerlin and Barry to resolve the tie for first place ended in a draw. A three-game match starting on the following Monday, again to be played in the Dublin CC clubrooms, was then arranged.

[The report in the British Chess Magazine (Volume LXI, page 238) does not mention the Saturday play-off game and this omission is repeated in Di Felice, Chess Results 1941-1946 (McFarland, 2008) at page 17. This is unsurprising since Di Felice gives the BCM as his source. The resolution of third place is not clarified by Di Felice, while the BCM specifically indicates there was a tie for third. The correct state of affairs on these issues can be found in the contemporary reports of the Irish Independent, Irish Press and Irish Times. Di Felice also fell into a common error, which we pointed out in our June 2011 article T.G. Cranston: correcting and improving the record in referring to Timothy G. Cranston.]

Two games in the play-off match were played on the Monday. Kerlin won the first of these in 32 moves. Game 2 had a bizarre finale – Barry was in a winning position when he made an illegal move (he took his own Knight with a pawn). He then rectified this and forced Kerlin to resign. The third and final game in the play-off match was an interesting and hard-fought encounter.

Gerard Kerlin – Charles J. Barry
Dunsany Premier (play-off match) (Round 3)
Dublin, Tuesday 29th July 1941

Play through the game

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e3 0-0 6.Nf3 Nbd7 7.Rc1 c6 8.Bd3 h6 9.Bh4 dxc4 10.Bxc4 Nd5 11.Bg3 N7f6 12.0-0 Bd6 13.Bd3 Bxg3 14.hxg3 Qa5 15.e4 Nxc3 16.bxc3 Qxa2 17.c4 Qa5 18.e5 Ne8 19.Bb1 Qd8 20.Qd3 f5 21.Nd2 Qg5 22.f4 Qe7 23.c5 g6 24.Nc4 Rf7 25.Nd6 Nxd6 26.exd6
White already had good compensation for the pawn and this exchange seems to make the sitiuation more difficult for Black.
26…Qf6 27.Rfe1 b6 28.Re5 b5 29.Rce1 a5 30.Ba2 a4 31.Bxe6
According to the engines 31.Rxe6 was even stronger.
31…Bxe6 32.Rxe6 Qg7 33.d5! a3

Kerlin-Barry

Position after 33…a3

34.Qd1
Seeing the a-pawn advance, White seems to get cold feet. Plunging on with the logical 34.dxc6 should win, e.g. 34…a2 35.d7 a1Q 36.Rxa1 Qxa1+ 37.Kh2 Qa5 38.Re8+ Kh7 39.Rxa8 Qxa8 40.c7
34…a2 35.Qa1 b4 36.R6e5 cxd5 37.c6 Qf6 38.Re8+ Rxe8 39.Rxe8+ Kg7
Wrong square for the King – instead 39…Kh7 should lead to a draw after 40.Qxa2 (best) Qxd6
40.Re5 b3 41.c7 Rf8 42.c8Q Rxc8 43.Re7+ Kg8 44.Qxf6 1-0

Although the Irish Championship did not resume until 1946, the Dunsany Premier Tourney was never held again.

No Name          Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Prize

1  G.J. Kerlin   6     * 1 0 0 = 1 1 1 1 =  First
2  C.J. Barry    6     0 * = 1 1 0 1 1 1 =  Second
3  A. Bourke     5.5   1 = * = = 1 = 0 = 1  Third
4  T.G. Cranston 5.5   1 0 = * = 0 = 1 1 1 
5  J.J. O'Hanlon 5.5   = 0 = = * 0 1 1 1 1 
6  W. Nash       5     0 1 0 1 1 * = 0 1 = 
7  L.J. Close    3.5   0 0 = = 0 = * 1 0 1 
8  R.T. Varian   3     0 0 1 0 0 1 0 * 0 1 
9  S.A. French   3     0 0 = 0 0 0 1 1 * = 
10 T.A. Vard     2     = = 0 0 0 = 0 0 = * 

Play-offs for first: G.J. Kerlin 2.5-1.5 C.J. Barry
Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

The trials of Aibhistín de Búrca

At the Annual General Meeting of the Irish Chess Union on the 13th March 1935 the feasibility of sending a team to the International Team Tournament to be held in Warsaw in the second half of August was discussed. It was decided to make an appeal for funds and pending the result, consideration of who should be selected for the team was deferred.

Less than a month had passed when a meeting of the ICU Council on the 8th April was told that there had been considerable support for the venture from all parts of the island, with Dublin, Belfast, Limerick, Cork, Athlone, Kilkenny and Kildare all responding generously. It was confidently anticipated that the full funds needed would be forthcoming and it was decided to send an entry to FIDE. Selection of the five-player team was to be made at a later date.

It is at some point after this that the hero of our piece entered the fray. Apparently fearing that there would be a metropolitan stitch-up of the selection process, he launched a broadside at the ICU.

“At the time, I was a postgraduate student at Cork, and full of youthful confidence and arrogance. When the composition of the Irish team was announced, I immediately sent an indignant telegram to the Irish Chess Union demanding representation for the provinces and challenging the entire team to personal combat! Luckily for me, no doubt, the Irish Chess Union did not take up this challenge, but they did invite me to come to Dublin to play a five-game challenge match against the promising young player, Oscar Quigley.” (Source: International Team Tournament Warsaw 1935 by Austin Bourke: Chess in Ireland, January 1960, page 12)

I have been unable to find any official announcement of the team in the period before the Quigley match. Perhaps de Búrca had heard rumours of its composition. Under a headline “First Three Places Already Filled?” the Irish Independent for the 30th April speculated that Brian Reilly (born of English parents in France and still residing there, but eligible through his County Meath-born paternal grandfather), the Irish champion James Creevey and J.J. O’Hanlon would be on the team. However it did go on to say: “The other two places will be hard to fill, as there are so many to be considered.”

Bourke’s 1960 article did not, at least in hindsight, take issue with Reilly, who was a “natural choice for Board 1” or Creevey “as Irish champion, an automatic choice at Board 2..” He expected O’Hanlon and T.G. Cranston, O’Hanlon’s great rival and fellow-veteran, also to be on the team. In relation to his fifth “suspect”: “It was said that Gerald Abrahams, then lecturing at Queen’s University, Belfast was willing to play on the Irish team.” I am unaware what the residence qualification then was, but while the Englishman Abrahams had lectured in law in Belfast it was probably only during the 1933-1934 academic year and therefore it is highly unlikely he would have been eligible to compete for Ireland.

The schedule for de Búrca set by the Irish Chess Union was an arduous one. The first game of his match against Quigley was held at the Dublin Chess Club rooms at 20 Lincoln Place on the evening of the 22nd May. After five hours play, de Búrca was victorious. The following day, de Búrca won game 2 on the 26th move, but Quigley then hit back with wins in 23 and 30 moves respectively in games 3 and 4. The final game was scheduled for the following morning. Here we pick up de Búrca’s 1960 account again:

 I won the first two games readily enough, but, in the long run, shaded the match only by winning the final game. My relief was shortlived, for, rather unkindly, a new opponent, Tom Cox, was now brought forward and I was required to play a three-game match against him.

De Búrca had won the final match game against Quigley in 32 moves on the morning of the 24th, but precisely when he became aware of the further trial is unclear. The Dublin papers only that morning had announced a two-game match between de Búrca and Cox, play in game 1 to start at 6.00pm in the evening with game 2 commencing at 10.00am on the 25th.

Perhaps de Búrca had been aware that if the Cox match ended tied at 1-1, a third deciding game would be played. In any event the provincial raider made short shrift of his second young metropolitan adversary. Game 1 ended with Cox’s resignation on his 17th move and the second game was even shorter. As Bourke pointed out Cox, at this point in his short career, was “not at all as strong as he was later to become.”

Final position

Final position

T. Cox – A. Bourke
International Trial Match (Game 2)
Dublin, 25th May 1935

Play through the game
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 cxd5 4.Bd3 Nc6 5.c3 Qc7 6.f4 Nf6 7.Nf3 e6 8.0–0 Bd6 9.Ne5 0–0 10.Qc2 Ne7 11.Nd2 Nf5 12.g4? Ne3 White resigned 0–1
[Source: Cork Examiner, 27th May 1935, page 2]

Whether these match wins absolutely guaranteed de Búrca a place in the Warsaw squad is unclear but he clearly believed that he had “fought my way into the team.” Just ten days later the official announcement of the team appeared in the press. At a meeting of the ICU Council held in the Dublin Chess Club, the place of de Búrca’s victories, the five selected (in board order) were B. Reilly, J. Creevey, J.J. O’Hanlon, T. G. Cranston and A. de Búrca.

A short explanation about the name of the winner of the two trial matches is necessary here. In his professional life as a distinguished meteorologist and for the greater part of his chess career Patrick Martin Austin Bourke used the English form of his name. However when he played in the 1935 International Team Tournament he used the Irish version de Búrca. References to the English form of his third forename are plentiful but sightings of the use of its Irish version are very rare. Indeed even Olimpbase, the quintessential source for team competition, refers to Austin de Burca. This is no trivial matter as there is more than one possibility. The best place to find the answer is in reports of the Oireachtas Championships, an event confined to Irish-speakers,. Most of the contemporary press reports of the 1935 trial matches only use the English forms of his name; however on page 9 of the Irish Independent for the 25th May reference is made (without use of the fada) to Aibhistín de Búrca.

Posted in Games, Players | 3 Comments

Irish championship 2008

A tournament report for the 2008 Irish championship has now been added to the archive here. The champion was Alexander Baburin, who was playing in his first, and so far only, championship, after finishing joint first with Alon Greenfeld, who was ineligible for the title.

We’re fortunate to have an almost complete set of games: only one of the 134 games is missing. We’re even more fortunate because of the number of interesting games: the report’s selection contains 22 games, and even at that another dozen could easily have been added.

This report fills the most recent gap in the coverage of the Irish championship. There is much information available about many other championships, and rounding out the coverage will be a priority in 2015.

Posted in Irish championships, Tournaments | Leave a comment