Hebden-Lalić, Bunratty blitz final 2014

It isn’t often that we have access to full blitz games, but the final of this year’s Bunratty Blitz tournament is an exception: Damien Cunningham at Ballynafeigh Chess put togther an excellent video, from which it’s possible to reconstruct the entire game:

Hebden - lalic, Bunratty blitz 2014
Hebden – Lalić
Bunratty Blitz 2014 (final)

1. d4 e6 2. Nf3 c5 3. c3 Nf6 4. Bg5 h6 5. Bxf6 Qxf6 6. e4 cxd4 7. cxd4 Bb4+ 8. Nc3 O-O 9. Rc1 Nc6 10. e5 Qe7 11. Bd3 d6 12. O-O dxe5 13. dxe5 Rd8 14. Qe2 Bd7 15. Qe4 g6 16. h4 Be8 17. h5 Bxc3 18. Rxc3 Rd5 19. hxg6 fxg6 20. Qf4 Qf8 21. Qxf8+ Kxf8 22. Bc4 Rc5 23. Bxe6 Rxc3 24. bxc3 Rd8 25. c4 b6 26. Bd5 Nb4 27. Nd4 Ke7 28. Rd1 b5 (diagram)

29. Ne6 Rc8 30. Rb1 Nxa2 31. Ra1 Nb4 32. Rxa7+ Bd7 33. Nf4 g5 34. Ng6+ Ke8 35. e6 Bc6 36. Rh7 Kd8 37. Rh8+ Kc7 38. Rxc8+ Kxc8 39. Ne7+ Kc7 40. Nxc6 Nxc6 41. Bxc6 Kxc6 42. cxb5+ 1-0

[Click to replay the game.]

Posted in Games | 1 Comment

Joe Noone, David Denny

The answers to Thursday’s puzzle are Joe Noone (Player A) and David Denny (Player B).

The original source is David Denny’s Flickr account. The players, from left to right, are Joe Noone, Martin O’Neill, David Denny, Brendan Bartley, Tom McHugh, and Gerry Doyle.

Joe Noone’s long and continuing career includes a joint Leinster champion title in 1984.

David Denny played mostly with Kevin Barry, but was on the winning U.C.D. team in the 1976-77 Armstrong Cup. His brothers Brian (three years younger) and Kevin (six years younger) also played: David and Brian both played on the 1974 Glorney Cup team, along with another set of brothers, Paul and Martin Delaney. (Kevin was a contemporary of mine: I remember him from Community Games competitions, and also from Leinster Schools leagues.)

There are several more (high quality) chess photos on David Denny’s Flickr account that capture the Community Games atmosphere very well.

Posted in Photos, Puzzles | 1 Comment

Who?

Ballyfermot 1970

This photo shows the Ballyfermot team that won the national Community Games championship in 1970. (Click on the picture for a larger version.)

One player in this picture (call him Player A) was later a Leinster champion. He’s still playing, and in fact he’s playing in this year’s Armstrong Cup. Who is he?

Another player in the picture (call him Player B) came from a chess-playing family, was one of a pair of brothers on the same Glorney Cup team and was on an Armstrong Cup-winning team. Who is he?

The second question is much harder, I think, as Player B hasn’t played in decades.

The photo is shown with permission (for which many thanks), but I won’t give the reference just yet as it would give away some of the solution.

Posted in Photos, Puzzles | 1 Comment

Pickett’s Charge

Pickett's lineThe latest issue of The New Winawer Report has been posted on the Winawer page. This deals with a side line in the Poisoned Pawn, which was the subject of new analysis in Emanuel Berg’s new volume on the 7 Qg4 Winawer: White plays 11 h4!? instead of the virtually universal 11 f4 in the main line Poisoned Pawn.

Though Berg’s analysis is excellent, he misses the background and the original game in this line. The idea is due to the London player and author Len M. Pickett, later recommended by Andrew Martin, and the original game appeared in CHESS in November 1975. It’s not too surprising that Berg missed it, as it appears in no modern database (and, to be fair, was played well before Berg was born).

Berg gives an effective antidote to Pickett’s original idea of 11 h4 and 12 Rh3. But for reasons discussed in this month’s issue, the move order 11 h4 and 12 f4 brings some benefits to White.

Posted in Articles | 1 Comment

Armstrong Cup 1976-77

The Armstrong Cup page has been updated with details of the 1976-77 season. In a close finish U.C.D. retained the cup, fighting off the challenge of Portmarnock, Dublin A, and Collegians. The winning team consisted of Bernard Kernan, Oisín McGuinness, Paul Wallace, Conor Barrington, J. Bradley, M. O’Donnell, Ciarán O’Hare, B. Redmond, D. Denny, and C. McGuinness (from two scorecards).

From Walsh-Mcguinness, Armstrong Cup 1977No games from this season are in the ICU games archive, but here’s one from J.J. Walsh’s scorebook, where he has White against U.C.D.’s board 2 Oisín McGuinness. McGuinness struggled in the opening and was already lost around move 11. The diagrammed position is with White to move. The finish was 24. e6 fxe6 25. Ne5 Qc8 26. fxg6 1-0, though there must be many other ways of winning also. [Click to replay the full game.]

Oddly, this is the first game of J.J. Walsh’s in the games archive here.

[Update, February 24, 2014: David McAlister has provided two more Irish Times articles that I didn’t have (October 14, 1976 and February 11, 1977), with the results of three more matches, for which thanks.]

Posted in Armstrong Cup, Games, Tournaments | 2 Comments

Another queen sacrifice

A while back we had a queen sacrifice from Oliver Dunne that was A la Morphy.

Menon-Dunne, Heidenfeld Trpy 2013-14Oliver has submitted another game, for which many thanks, this time from a Heidenfeld match last weekend. And it’s another queen sacrifice! In the diagrammed position Oliver ventured 27. … Qxd6!!??, sacrificing the queen for two minor pieces.

Let’s set this up as a puzzle.
(a) is this sacrifice sound?
(b) if so, what’s the evaluation after this move?
(c) if not, is there anything better for Black, and how should White continue?

In the game, regardless of the answers to the questions above, White did not make the most of her chances (though Oliver notes that time pressure was a factor) and Black won a resounding victory. [Click to play through the full game.] So an extra question is

(d) where could White have improved?

Posted in Games, Puzzles | 3 Comments

Samuel Beckett and the Armstrong Cup

“Samuel Beckett’s obsession with chess: how the game influenced his work” runs the headline of a recent article in the Guardian by Stephen Moss, which continues “Chess was one of Samuel Beckett’s great obsessions, touching everything from Murphy to Endgame.” Indeed the novel Murphy features an unusual chess game (which can be played over on the Elm Mount C.C. web site, courtesy of Oliver Dunne); the chess content of the play Endgame seems strictly limited to the title.

Moss’s article describes other evidence of Beckett’s interest in chess, including a score of chess books, ‘filled with his comments’, and his reputed off-hand games with the artist Marcel Duchamp, who was certainly a strong player: he competed in several French championships and Olympiads. (Though there is some dispute over whether they actually played each other.)

I admit that this evidence by itself leaves me with some scepticism. That Beckett had at least some interest in the game is clear enough, but how far did it really go, and is there any evidence that Beckett was a chess player, as chess players would understand the term? These matters can be exaggerated. What I have in mind is some tangible evidence that Beckett had more involvement with chess than I have with golf, or snooker, say. I have played both games, sometimes with expert players, and I even think there’s the odd book on each scattered around the house. But it would astonish anyone who knew me to hear me described as a golfer or a snooker player. As far as I know, no evidence has ever been presented to show that Beckett exceeds this threshold.

Until now!

Samuel Barclay Beckett was an undergraduate at Trinity from 1923 to 1927. In the 1925-26 season of the Armstrong Cup, the six teams included both Trinity (or Dublin University) and National Army G.H.Q. The Army magazine An t-Óglách has a full set of issues online at https://antoglach.militaryarchives.ie/. Here’s the front cover of vol. 3, no. 24, from November 28, 1925:

An_t-Oglach_1925_11_28_p1

(there’s a spurious fada on the ‘a’: An t-Óglach = The Volunteer)

and page 7 5 of the same issue is devoted to chess:

An_t-Oglach_1925_11_28_p7

At the end of the right column there’s a scorecard of the Armstrong Cup match between National Army G.H.Q. and Dublin University, played at McKee Barracks on November 24, 1925:

An_t-Oglach_1925_11_28_p7-detail

Board 6 for Dublin University is S. B. Beckett.

I suppose it’s possible that it’s not the same person, and that some other S. B. Beckett was at Trinity at the same time, and also interested in chess. But I don’t believe it: that’s our man!

Posted in Articles | 3 Comments

Gonzaga Masters 2014

The Gonzaga Classic was held two weeks ago, a little earlier than usual. In the Masters, David Fitzsimons had a 200+ point rating advantage over the field and had won the event for the four previous years. Once again in Irish sport, however, 5-in-a-row was a bridge too far, and this time victory went instead to Killian Delaney.

The organisers deserve great credit for making the games available: Herbert Scarry’s report on the ICU web site has 49 of the 50 games. A full tournament report has now been posted here.

There were several interesting games, in particular John Healy’s win as Black against Conor O’Donnell in round 1 and the marathon Janusaitis-Nikrow game in round 3, as well as Scott Mulligan’s shock win against Fitzsimons in round 1.

Delaney-Fitzsimons, Gonzaga Masters 2014The most interesting of all was the deciding last-round game between Killian Delaney and David Fitzsimons. Delaney, playing White, was a full point ahead and needed only to draw. In the diagrammed position he uncorked the amazing 21. Nxf5 ?!!?. I did not understand the thinking behind this move so finally resorted to Houdini 3.0, which finds itself baffled also. After 21. … exf5 22. Qf3 Qg4? (22. … Rd8 and Black must be close to winning) 23. Qd5 Rd8 24. Bc5 f4? (24. … Bxc5 with complications) 25. Re1 fxg3 26. hxg3 Qf5 27. Bxe7! the players agreed a draw. After 27. … Nxe7 28. Re5 Qf7 29. Rae1 White recovers the piece and emerges a pawn up, e.g. 29. … 0-0 30. Rxe7 Qxd5 31. Nxd5 with good winning chances.

[Click to replay the full game.]

[Update, February 12, 2014: the first posted version of the tournament report had some glitches, spotted by the eagle-eyed David McAlister. The most serious was the entire omission of the game Aherne-Murray from round 4, which caused knock-on effects throughout. Another glitch was caused by a discrepancy between the ICU ratings report and the actual results: David Murray was initially defaulted in round 1 in error, and that’s how it is still shown in the ratings report, but in fact he received a ½-point bye, as again confirmed by David McAlister after checking with Herbert Scarry; this affected the prize list as Murray finished clear second on 4½/6.]

Posted in Gonzaga Classics, Tournaments | 1 Comment

Ruane-O’Boyle, Heidenfeld 2013-14

ruane-oboylle-2014An entertaining game from last weekend’s Heidenfeld match Drogheda-St. Benildus has been posted on the Benildus web site (The Madness of the St George–good title!). In the diagrammed position it’s Black to play his 14th.

The madness was all set in motion by 7. … bxc3 ??! (the ‘!’ is for entertainment value).

[Click to replay the full game.]

Update, February 13, 2014: Dónal O’Boyle adds a comment on the Drogheda C.C. web site, claiming that capturing the knight on move 7 is fine: “After 10.-Bc4, I should have played …-cxb2 11.-Bxb2 (others are bad)-Qa5+ 12.-c3-Nh6! and black is winning, for example: 13.-O-O-d6 14.-Bd5-dxe5 15.-Bxb7-Ra7 and black is ok.”

Posted in Games | 4 Comments

Crichton-Wall, Leinster championship 2005

Many thanks to Martin Crichton for supplying his game against Gavin Wall in the last round of the 2005 Leinster championship (not available anywhere else).

This must have been one of the strongest Leinster championships ever, with 8 of the 15 competitors rated over 2200, including Alexander Baburin and Gawain Jones. Gavin Wall had started well with 3½/4, only conceding a draw to Gawain Jones. He lost the crucial round 5 game against Baburin, also on 3½/4, though, setting the stage for a last-round game against bottom seed Martin Crichton.

Crichton-Wall, Leinster championship 2006It was, as Martin puts it, a topsy-turvy game. After a significant amount of pressing Wall managed to win a pawn, though there were so few pawns left on the board it was going to be hard to convert to a win. The disastrous 46. … Rc1?? blundered a piece. Wall must have spotted immediately what he had done, as he offered a draw .

The diagrammed position was reached after 49. Rxe1. And now, is this a win for White with best play? Martin thinks so, but I’m not so sure. It’s a bishop of the wrong colour for the a-pawn, so if Black manages to exchange White’s h-pawn, he need only put his rook on c4 and he must have enough to draw.

[Update, May 8, 2020: I must take back the last statement above. If the king-side pawns are removed, the Lomonosov tablebases show that it’s a win for White. The problem for Black is that the b-pawn is weak and will eventually be lost.]

In fact both players were increasingly short of time–there was no increment–and after several more twists and turns all pawns were finally eliminated, getting down to the theoretically drawn ending of R+B v. R. This is not always easy to show in practice, though, and in addition both players were down to 90 seconds or so. This was the last game to finish everyone else was crowded around the board, adding to the pressure. Wall indeed went wrong, but 71. Bc5? let him off the hook. As it was, he was down to 12 seconds on the clock and missed the chance with 71. … Ra1? and had to resign after 72. Rb8. But as late as this last move he could have drawn. How?

[Click to replay the full game.]

Posted in Games | 3 Comments