Irish Championship 1951

A report on the 1951 Irish championship has been added to the tournament pages here.

The championship was held in University College, Cork from the 16th to the 24th July. Eighteen players participated over eight rounds with the Swiss pairing system being used.

The field included the veteran nine-time Irish titleholder John O’Hanlon and the winners of the three most recent Championships – Dónal O’Sullivan (1948), Paddy Kennedy (1949) and Vincent Maher (1950).

Austin Bourke had been in good form earlier in 1951, winning the Civil Service Championship (which had qualified him for the national championship) and then going on to secure the Leinster title. Bourke was unbeaten after five rounds in Cork, but had won only twice to leave himself a half-point behind the leaders. He then stepped on the gas in the next two rounds, beating O’Sullivan and Maher to assume the sole lead. Going into the final round only Bourke, O’Hanlon and O’Sullivan remained in contention for the Championship title. The top two pairings (with scores after round 7 in brackets) were:

A. Bourke [5.5] – J.J. O’Hanlon [5.0]
D.J. O’Sullivan [5.0] – E.N. Mulcahy [4.5]

O’Sullivan had the better of the opening against Mulcahy and, in the position below, missed an excellent chance.

Position after Black's 14th move

O’Sullivan -v- Mulcahy

15.Ng5! Now if 15…fxg5 (best) 16.Bxa8 and if 16…Rxa8 White plays 17.Qc6 forking Rook and Bishop, coming out of the combination at least the exchange up. Black should instead probably play 16…Qxe2 – although that would also concede the exchange, there might be some potential for a kingside attack.

Although 15.Nd2, the move actually played, still maintained a slight advantage for O’Sullivan, he could not subsequently cope with Mulcahy’s energetic play and the game ended in checkmate on Black’s 37th move.

Mulcahy was awarded the best game prize for this effort by James Creevey, winner of two Irish Championship matches against O’Hanlon in the 1930s.

Meanwhile, according to the Cork Examiner, after Bourke played the Réti Opening “O’Hanlon’s ingenious efforts to win failed to bear fruit against Bourke’s careful defence. The draw was sufficient to give Bourke the championship.”

Although a Waterford man, and by 1951 resident in Dublin, Bourke winning the Championship at University College Cork seems very appropriate – he had first made his name in the chess world while a student at U.C.C., earning a place in the 1935 Irish Olympiad team.

After competing his studies, he remained in Cork to be a lecturer in Mathematics, until in 1938 he joined the Irish Meteorological Service on its foundation, eventually becoming its Director. He had a distinguished career in public service and was a noted expert on potato blight and the Irish Famine.

After his 1951 victory Bourke continued to play competitive chess, but he never participated in the Irish Championship again.

Posted in Irish championships, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The internment of John O’Hanlon

On June 10, 1922, one hundred years ago today, John O’Hanlon, Irish champion since 1913, was arrested in Portadown. A report appeared in the Belfast News-Letter the following Monday (page 5):

ARRESTS IN PORTADOWN

In the early hours of Saturday morning military and police in Crossley and Lancia cars visited Portadown and arrested a number of well-known residents who are supposed to be associated with the Sinn Fein movement. The prisoners included Mr. J. J. O’Hanlon (Irish chess champion), proprietor of the Queen’s Hotel; Richard Brophy, Frank Lapping, and Patrick Lynch, publicans; Peter Connolly, Thomas Foy, mill-worker; and John and Henry Sharkey, horse-dealers. It is understood that the prisoners were removed to Belfast.

An update appeared in the same source on July 1 (page 6):

Hotel Proprietor’s Arrest

Mr. T. J. Campbell, K.C., with whom was Mr. C. L. Shiel (instructed by Mr. McCullen, solicitor, Portadown), applied for a writ of habeas corpus, directed to the governor of the prison at Belfast requiring him to bring John James O’Hanlon, hotel proprietor, Portadown, before the court. Counsel moved on the affidavit of Vera O’Hanlon, of Ashdown, Portadown, who said that in the early hours of Saturday, 10th June, forces of the Crown went to Ashtown while she was in Belfast, and took her husband into custody, giving no reason for their action. He had since been detained in prison, though no charge had been made against him; nor had he been informed that a charge would be preferred. He had done or said nothing to justify his arrest or detention, and had lived in Portadown all his life. His absence from the hotel was a very serious loss.

His Lordship gave notice to serve notice of motion for a writ of habeas corpus, and directed that the matter should come up for argument on Thursday next.

A further update appeared in the same source on July 11 (page 7), under the headline “Portadown Man Interned”, providing a long discussion of the court proceedings the previous day, which were contentious. Ultimately, the Lord Chief Justice, one of two judges hearing the application, “made an order for the production of the prisoner on that day week and to have a commissioner present to take his affidavit”.

On July 18, the same source reported (page 7) on the continuation one week later. “The case had been adjourned from Monday last for the production of the prisoner, and he was now present in court under escort.” An affidavit of Colonel C. G. Wickham (Inspector-General Royal Ulster Constabulary) stated that reliable information had been received that O’Hanlon was a member of an unlawful association and part of a widespread and highly organised conspiracy whose object was the overthrow of the established Government of Northern Ireland, and on this basis O’Hanlon was interned.

In response, O’Hanlon’s counsel read his affidavit, in which he denied the allegations:

He was not, and never had been, a member of any unlawful association, or a party to the conspiracy; nor did he at any time act, nor was he at any time about to act in a manner prejudicial to the preservation of peace. Any information to the contrary was absolutely false and malicious. He was a native of Portadown, where both his father and grandfather lived, and he was aged about 45. He had lived all his life in Portadown. All his life had been passed in Portadown, and he was well-known to the residents of all denominations there. He had been engaged in the licensed trade in Portadown for 25 years. Since April, 1921, he had owned the Queen’s Hotel, Portadown, for which he paid £8,000. He had been a director of the Portadown Gas Company for the past five years, and had also been financially interested in a number of English industrial concerns. Outside his home and his business, his chief interest in life had been chess, and he had held the Irish Chess Championship for the past nine years. He had never, by word or act or conduct, given the slightest ground for the allegations against him, and was totally at a loss to know on what ground he was suspected. He believed that no such conspiracy existed in Portadown, which had been peaceful for years and free from offences against law and order. The affidavit concluded by a reference to a number of postcards written from prison to his wife authorising her to take the legal proceedings, and in one of which he said he was always a Constitutional Nationalist, and never a Sinn Feiner.

Decision of the court.

The Lord Chief Justice said that the only question the court had to decide in an application of this kind was whether at the moment Mr. O’Hanlon was legally held. … They now decided that the warrant was within the powers of the Minister of Home Affairs. It was not their province to express an opinion on the facts, and they refused the application.

Mr. Justice Wilson—I concur and have nothing to add.

On August 21, the Irish Times had a short item (page 7):

CHESS CHAMPION RELEASED

Mr. J. J. O’Hanlon, Queen’s Hotel, Portadown, the Irish Chess champion, who had been interned by the Northern Government authorities in June last, along with several hundred other persons suspected of conspiring against the Government, has been released. Mr. O’Hanlon recently brought an application in the Northern High Court for a writ of habeas corpus, and entered an affidavit against the charge made against him. His release has given much satisfaction to Irish Chess players.

Posted in Irish champions, News | Leave a comment

An echo of Capablanca

The last round of the recent Sligo Spring Tournament Masters featured an interesting ending on board 1 between Lara Putar and the tournament winner, Ukrainian WGM Evgeniya Doluhanova.

Duras - Capablanca and Lara Putar - Doluhanova
Duras – Capablanca, Rice C.C. Masters, New York 1913
Lara Putar – Doluhanova, Sligo Spring Tournament Masters 2022
White to play

The diagram shows a critical position from the game and also, curiously, from the famous game Duras – Capablanca, New York 1913.

A similar position, with colours reversed and rooks and one king in different places, arose in Capablanca – Yates, Hastings 1930-31, and this version is usually used as the model for how the stronger player wins with this pawn configuration. Capablanca’s breakthrough in the first game was incorrect, and allowed Duras an opportunity to escape with a draw. Even the second game featured some slips, including one that allowed Yates an opportunity to achieve a drawn position, though Capablanca’s basic method was sound.

There were no such flaws in Doluhanova’s play. “The winning plan is a rook transfer to the eighth rank followed by f4-f5-f6+. If the Black rook takes aim at the e5-pawn, White defends it with the rook from e8.” Dvoretsky (2008). This basic plan worked smoothly here.

The ending has many subtleties and difficulties, and the official verdict has changed in numerous ways down the years, with some discoveries appearing in the last ten years. Though the diagrammed position is lost for White with best play, the sternest defence is tricky to overcome. The playable game provides relevant links.

[Click to replay the full game. Note that, as usual, clicking on the triangle on the right below the board steps into variations.]

Posted in Games | Leave a comment

Wenman-O’Hanlon, Hastings 1945-46

Sean has recently posted about a couple of newly rediscovered O’Hanlon games in A Lively Skirmish: O’Hanlon – Scott, British Championship 1921 and O’Hanlon – Seitz, British Championship Major Open B 1938. The nine-time winner of the Irish Championship lost both those games, but there are many O’Hanlon wins to be found in old newspaper columns, some still waiting to be unearthed.

I came across one such win a couple of days ago which (until the date of this post) does not appear to have been available anywhere else. It was played at the 1945-46 Hastings Congress, resuming after an enforced absence due to the Second World War. To mark its local hero returning to international competition the Portadown Times for 29th December 1945 provided this potted biography:

“Mr. J.J. O’Hanlon, the Irish Chess Champion, who is a native of Portadown, and who some years ago sold out his property here and went to reside in Dublin, has left Eire by air, travelling to Hastings to compete with the masters of the game. His prowess as a chess player, together with his swimming feats and skill as an ex-Portadown Club oarsman, have been paid a rare compliment by being featured at length by “Irish Press” and “Irish Independent” columnists. Mr. O’Hanlon’s longest chess game, one writes, took three years. Another states he swam across Carlingford Lough from Greenore to Warrenpoint and right across Lake Geneva. We too, join in wishing him success in his contests at Hastings.”

Francis Percival (Percy) Wenman – John James O’Hanlon
Hastings Premier Reserves C, 1945-46, Round 10
Source: (Dublin) Evening Herald, 26th January 1946, page 4
Annotations by two-time Irish champion James Creevey

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Bc5
The classical defence to Ruy Lopez is not often played nowadays and possibly is not as safe as the more usual 3…a6 but Black has his own convictions and the courage of them.
4.c3 Nge7 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Nc3 d5 8.e5
To take or not to take, that is the question. Generally the capture should be made though the advance may be considered when Black’s King’s Knight has been developed on f6. Here 8.exd5 should have been played.
8…0-0 9.Bg5 Bg4
Black’s opening moves are exemplary; already he has gained a move.
10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.0-0 h6 12.Bh4 Qd7 13.h3 Bh5 14.g4
Setting up a target for Black, who soon starts shooting.
14…Bg6 15.Ne2
Moves 14 and 15 were probably played by White under impression the Black’s King’s Bishop could be won. Probably the immediate advance of the Queen’s side pawns (a3, b4) would have been better.

Diagram 1

15…h5! 16.Qa4 hxg4
Mark Twain’s couplet fits here:-
“Thrice is he armed that has his quarrel just;
but four times he who gets his blow in first.”
17.Nh2 Nf5 18.Bg3 Nxg3 19.Nxg3 Be7
With two well-posted Bishops against two badly-placed Knights, Black has clearly the better game.
20.hxg4 f5 21.gxf5 Bxf5 22.Rfc1 Rab8! 23.Qxc6 Rxb2 24.Qxd7 Bxd7 25.Nh1 Bh4 26.Rxc7 Bxf2+ 27.Nxf2 Rfxf2 28.Rxd7 Rg2+ 29.Kf1 Rxh2 30.Kg1 Rbg2+ 31.Kf1 Rf2+

Diagram 2

32.Ke1 
32.Kg1 is also a loss. 32…Rhg2+ 33.Kh1 Rg4 and 34.Rg1 allows mate by 34…Rh4 . In reply to any other defence Black retreats his Queen’s Rook to f5 and mates on the h-file next move.
[There appears to be a flaw in Creevey’s analysis. Instead of the blunder 34.Rg1, White should play 34.Re1 Rf5 35.Re2 defending against the mate and with best play the ending would have been drawn. Indeed, on move 34, moving the Rook anywhere between b1 and d1 also provides access to the second rank, preventing the suggested mate, while pushing the a-pawn forward also achieves the same objective. Therefore we can conclude that 32.Ke1 was the losing blunder]
32…Rf4!!
[Despite Creevey’s two exclamation marks for the final move, there is a more clear-cut (and perhaps more obvious) way to finish off White. The move played will lead to winning the a1-Rook, but instead 32…Rb2 threatens mate which White can only delay but not prevent.]
33. resigns.
Congratulations to Mr. O’Hanlon on his win against a player who has repeatedly won the Scottish championship.

[Play through the game]

There is a twist in the tale. It appears from the report below (my thanks to Sean for referring me to it) that, contrary to the game score in the Evening Herald, Wenman did not resign immediately after 32…Rf4 and that the game only ended some moves further on.

Irish Independent, 9 January 1946, page 6

If we accept that the game did not end with White resigning after Black’s 32nd move, we now need to search for a reconciliation between the differing accounts in the two newspaper articles.

Diagram 3

The diagram immediately above shows the final position according to the game score in the Evening Herald. One plausible continuation that works reasonably with the Irish Independent narrative would start with 33.Rxd5
(on 33.Rd1 then Re4+ 34.Kf1 Rh1+ wins the Rook; or 33.Rc1 Re4+ 34.Kd1 Rxd4+ 35.Ke1 Rh1+ again winning the Rook, though in this line there is also the immediately decisive finish of 34…Rg4 when mate with Rg1 is inevitable)
and then after 33…Rh1+ 34.Kd2 (or 34.Ke2) 34…Rxa1 we would arrive at the material imbalance of two Rooks and two pawns versus a single Rook and three pawns mentioned in the Irish Independent article (though my suggested moves seem more compressed than the process described in the Independent).

So instead of ending our game score with “33. resigns”, we could replace it with something like “and White resigned after 40 moves.”

The moral of this story is that if you find a game score, it does not necessarily mean that it tells you the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Sligo Spring Tournament 2022—II

A report on the Sligo Spring Tournament Challengers 2022 has been added to the tournament pages here. The event attracted an impressive entry of 87 players, and after five rounds, two players were on full points: Dariy Kelbas (Ukraine) and Jason Liu.

Very unusually for the third section, many games are available: we have 41 of the 191 played, from a combination of live boards and pgn contributed by players, and relayed via chief organiser Craig DuBose, for which many thanks.

Once again, there was much interesting and enterprising chess. Here are three examples.

Dineen - Adebowale, Sligo Challengers 2022

The most interesting game of all for me was Dineen – Adebowale, round 4. In the first diagram, Dineen has (correctly) sacrificed a bishop on g6, but has no immediately obvious way of pressing home the attack. How should White continue? Engines find two substantially different ways; I did not find either too evident. (See game for answers.) Later in the same game, Black erred in a king and five pawns versus king, bishop, and two pawns ending; again, the decisive error was not at all obvious.

Campbell - Gallagher, Sligo Challengers 2022

In Campbell -Gallagher, round 3, the second diagram was reached after White’s 14th. In her live commentary on Twitch, Diana Mirza pointed out that after the simple 14… Nc6 15. Qb7 Qc8, Black wins quickly on material. Instead, Gallagher played the creative, though not entirely correct, 14… Nb3!??, threatening mate on the move. After 15. Nbd2 Rxa1, White could have played 16. Nxb3 and emerged with a worse but still playable game. Instead play continued 16. Bxd8 Nc1+ 17. Ke1 Nxd3+ 18. Ke2 Nc1+ 19. Ke1, and now Black could have had a quick mate via 19… Nb3+ (or 19… Na2+) 20. Ke2 Bc4+ and mate next move. Instead, after 19… Bxd8, the material balance of two rooks and two bishops versus queen was overwhelming, and Black duly converted, despite White dangling a stalemate trap near the end.

Smikle - Campbell Sligo Challengers 2022

In Smikle – Campbell, round 2, for which there is a nice photo immediately before the game, the third diagram shows the position after 31. Rf6. Andrew Campbell’s annotation describes his next move 31… Rg8 as a blunder (a little harshly!). What is wrong with this move, and what should he have played instead? (See game for answers.)

[Update, May 9, 2022: a revised report has been uploaded, adding Edward Loane’s annotations of his round 4 and 5 games, for which many thanks.]

Posted in Games, Tournaments | Leave a comment

The Sligo Spring Tournament 2022

I have not traced the full history of chess in Sligo—I’d be interested if anyone can shed light on this—but it goes back at least as far as 1912, when the Leinster Express announced a 10-board correspondence match between Queen’s County and Sligo County Chess Clubs. Except for an Irish Junior Championship held here a few years ago, though, I’m not aware of any tournaments there.

This gap has now been filled with the inaugural Sligo Spring Tournament, taking place this weekend at the Clayton Hotel, involving 128 players across three sections. Live boards are available for all games in the FIDE-rated Masters, and Diana Mirza is providing live commentary. A report on the Masters has been commenced here, and will be updated over the weekend. [Update, April 30, 2022: a report on the Major, up to the end of round 3, has also been added.]

Round 1: On board 1, it looked as though S. Anand Kumar, though putting up stubborn resistance against top seed Alexander Baburin, would come up short in an ending. His efforts were rewarded, however, when Baburin, very uncharacteristically for him, erred in the ending, and the game ended in a draw. Elsewhere, the new last year’s Irish U12 champion Jason Liu also drew against Sergio Esteve Sanchez. The other games went with seeding.

Flynn - Leon Putar, Sligo Masters 2022

The game of the round was the in-form Jacob Flynn’s win against Leon Putar. In the diagrammed position, he now played 18. Rxe6!. It would have been interesting to see his continuation after 18… Kxe6: though 19. Bh6 and 19. Qb3 are winning, and 19. Qd3 is much better for White, the most accurate move seems to be 19. Qa4!! (19… fxg5 20. Bxd5+!). Black played 18… Rxe6 instead and lost in short order.

Round 2: On board 1, James Toon had the better game as Black against the second seed, Ukrainian WGM Evgeniya Doluhanova, but erred and then didn’t find the most stubborn defence. The game on board 2 seems incomplete. On board 3, Alexander Baburin, who seems definitely out of sorts, drew against Pete Morriss, who could well have played on. On board 6, Andrey Ivanov had the unfortunate experience of blundering in a drawn (I think!) position, having been completely winning earlier.

Round 3: A quick draw on board 1 between Jacob Flynn and Evgeniya Doluhanova left them tied for first on 2½/3 with S. Anand Kumar, who won his round 3 game against Pete Morriss. On board 3, Alexander Baburin had a moment of chess blindness which might have derailed an otherwise smooth win against Leon Putar, but Leon missed his chance. In the most interesting game of the round, Lara Putar won a complex game against James Toon.

Scott - Wood, Sligo Major 2022

The Major has featured some entertaining chess. Here is an interesting moment from the third round game between Shay Scott and Yannick Woods. What should White play now? In the game he missed the opportunity and soon lost. See the full game for answer and sequel.

Lara Putar - Flynn, Sligo Masters 2022

Round 4: Evgeniya Doluhanova won convincingly on board 1 against S. Anand Kumar. The co-leader at the beginning of the round Jacob Flynn lost on board 2 against Lara Putar, in perhaps the most interesting game of the tournament. The third diagram shows the position with Flynn, as Black, to play his 35th. It seems, though this is far from obvious, that he has a win with 35… Qb8!, e.g., 36. Qc4 Bb2 37. Rxc2 Qg3! and White’s position collapses. Instead he erred with the plausible 35… Qf2, and later missed a not-too-straightforward drawing resource, and lost. On board 3, Alexander Baburin was held to another draw by Oisín O’Cuilleanain. On board 5, Leon Putar and Dylan Mize played an interesting opening—please tell me this isn’t theory!

Round 5: On board 1, Evgeniya Doluhanova outplayed Lara Putar in a long rook plus four pawns versus rook plus three pawns ending, with all pawns on the same flank, to win the tournament by a clear point. Alexander Baburin won against Jacob Flynn to finish clear second, with S. Anand Kumar, Oisín O’Cuilleanain, and Lara Putar sharing third place on 3/5.

Congratulations to the organisers for an outstanding inaugural event. An update on the Major and a report on the (huge) Challengers event will be added.

Update, May 3, 2022: The report for the Major has been updated to add the final results. Lukian Hushpit (Ukraine) won with 5/5, followed by Rustem Abdullayev on 4, while Steve Farry (England), David Hewitson (Sweden), James Scarry, and Yannick Woods shared third place on 3½.

Farry - Novak, Sligo Major 2022

Rounds 4 and 5 continued the Major’s record of enterprising and entertaining chess. The round 4 games O’Shea – Wynarczyk and Abdullayev – Hewitson were notable, but perhaps the most memorable was the round 5 game between Farry and Vjekoslav Novak. Novak sacrificed a piece, reaching the diagrammed position, and now has a clear win with 15. .. Qh6+ 16. Kg1 Qh2+ 17. Kf1, when the most precise way is 17… f4!, e.g., 18. Qd3 (what else?) Nc5! 19. dxc5 Bh3 and it’s all over. Instead he erred with 15… Rf6??, and after 16. Nde4 his queen was trapped, while there’s no mate: 16… Rh6+ 17. Bh3, etc.

Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

O’Hanlon – Seitz, British Championship Major Open B 1938

The last post commented that new games from long-ago events appear all the time. Here is another example, which has also surfaced this month, and which also involves John O’Hanlon.

This one is from a subsidiary event of the British Championship 1938, held in the Royal Pavilion in Brighton. The game appeared in the Augsburger Schachblatt a month after the event (discovered by Ulrich Tamm and contributed by him to BritBase). O’Hanlon’s opponent was Jakob Adolf Seitz, 1898-1970, joint winner of the section, who had a column in the publication at least earlier in the 1930’s (source), and was perhaps giving one of his own games here. It’s not a surprise to find, therefore, that O’Hanlon lost.

O'Hanlon - Seitz, British Championship Major Open B 1938
O’Hanlon – Seitz, British Championship Major Open B 1938 (8)
42. ?

The game itself is a puzzle, though. O’Hanlon outplayed his opponent and built up a decisive advantage. In the diagrammed position, 42. Rxb4 Rd1+ 43. Ka2 Rxg1 44. Rb7 is winning (44… h6? 45. Ra5). O’Hanlon seemed to lose the thread, though, and after a series of aimless manoeuvres and passive choices, finally lost.

[Click to replay the full game.]

Another game from the event, versus Alfred Joseph Butcher, has long been available in the ICU game archive. It was annotated by O’Hanlon for the Belfast News-Letter, and, naturally, features a fine win: click to replay.

O’Hanlon scored a respectable +4 =2 -5 in this 12-player all-play-all, finishing in joint 7th-8th places. Full event information can be found, once again, on the BritBase event page.

Posted in Games | Leave a comment

A Lively Skirmish: O’Hanlon – Scott, British Championship 1921

One of the interesting aspects of chess history is that missing games from long-ago events turn up out of the blue, rediscovered in some out-of-the-way publication.

One such game appeared this very month, discovered by “Tabanus” at chessgames.com and relayed via BritBase: the game between Irish champion John J. O’Hanlon and Roland H. V. Scott from the British Championship 1921.

This appeared the following day in the Westminster Gazette, August 18, 1921 p. 6, under the heading “A Lively Skirmish”, and the game itself doesn’t disappoint.

O'Hanlon - Scott, British Championship 1921
O’Hanlon – Scott, British Championship 1921 (9)
11. ?

The anonymous editor gave O’Hanlon’s previous move 10. Q(b7)xa8+ a question mark, but it turns out to be best. White would now have an overwhelming advantage after 11. a4!!, with 12. Bb5 to come. I must admit that this would not have occurred to me at all; I might have considered 11. Nd2, but this turns out to be about equal. O’Hanlon made the natural choice 11. gxf3.

Scott’s defence 11… g5 12. Bxg5 Bg7 13. Qxh8 Bxh8, though also natural, seems not to be best, and engines think White is winning again after 14. Nd2!. Why this is anything other than ‘unclear’ and why it is so much better than 14. b3 or David McAlister’s suggestion 14. Bc1!? (about equal, apparently) is mysterious to me.

O’Hanlon chose the natural enough 14. b3, and after the reply 14… Nxd4!, the second diagram was reached.

O'Hanlon - Scott, British Championship 1921, 14B
O’Hanlon – Scott, British Championship 1921 (9)
15. ?

Up to now, O’Hanlon’s choices have been understandable, but his next move 15. Be3? was poor: the continuation 15… Nxf3+ 16. Ke2 d4 was obvious enough, and left him irretrievably lost. Instead 15. Nd2 would have given him some advantage.

[Click to replay the full game.]

In this 12-player all-play-all, O’Hanlon finished 11th, with a record of +2 =0 -9. The full crosstable, with much other information, can be seen on the BritBase event page.

Posted in Games | Leave a comment

The John Bolger Cup 2022

The inaugural John Bolger Cup was held at Coláiste Éanna in Rathfarnham, Co. Dublin, from March 25-27. The event attracted 154 players across three sections. All games for the Masters section were broadcast via live boards, and a full report has now been added to the Tournaments pages here.

I have not seen any background information on the donor/honoree of the Cup, John Bolger.

The first round saw top seed Sébastien Mazé lose to the young Bulgarian player and FM Beloslava Krasteva, and second seed Matthew Turner had a quick draw on board 2. This scrambled the pairings, and after three rounds Leon Putar was in sole lead on full points, followed closely by his sister Lara and Kavin Venkatesan, plus Alexander Baburin and the Ukrainian IM Vladyslav Larkin, half a point behind. In round 4, Leon Putar lost to Larkin, Lara Putar to Baburin, and Venkatesan to Mazé. The last round saw a short draw between Baburin and Larkin to tie for first, joined by Jacob Flynn, on 4/5.

I’m never sure whether to mention blunders, as these are often painful for the players involved. I will just say that there was one for the ages in one round 2 game.

One interesting moment arose in the round 3 game between Colm Daly and the Dutch player Maxim Le Clercq.

Daly - Le Clercq, John Bolger Cup 2022
Daly – Le Clercq, John Bolger Cup 2022 (3)
47. ?

I have to guess that Colm was short of time, as he missed a straightforward win a few moves before the diagrammed position. Now it is appreciably more difficult, and after his next move he was lost. White has a startling resource here. What is it, and what should the result be with best play?

[Click to replay the full game (with the answer).]

Posted in Games, Tournaments | Leave a comment

Gibson – Doyle, Leinster Championship 1980

Among the many tributes that poured in for John Gibson was one at the Irish Go Association web site, which features a very nice recent photo:

John Gibson, February 2020

The photo’s metadata indicates that it was taken on February 29, 2020.

The last time I saw him, he remarked on the unusual friendliness of the Go community: if you’re ever in a strange city, make your way to the local Go club, and you are assured a warm welcome. It doesn’t seem to matter if you are a beginner: an expert will be willing to spend time with you.

Among the vast amount of material John has provided (some even dealing with Go), there are also several scoresheets. For this post, here is a game that does not appear in the ICU games archive, or any other database, as of today. It’s against Tony Doyle, from the Leinster Championship 1980. This strong 9-round event was held on a two-game-a-week schedule in April and May, and resulted in a win for the in-form Paul Delaney, who also won the Irish Championship later in the year. Tony Doyle was joint second, a point behind, and John finished in joint 8th, on 5/9.

In round 4, both players were going well, and were paired on board 2. John won a pawn early on, and the diagram shows the position when it came time to adjourn, with John, as White, to play and seal.

Gibson - Doyle, Leinster Championship 1980
Gibson – Doyle, Leinster Championship 1980 (4.2)
36. ?

After adjournment, Tony managed to simplify and generate enough counterplay to draw. Was there a win anywhere along the line?

[Click to replay the full game.]

Posted in Games, Photos, Players | Leave a comment